Salud Pública de México

Contribution of formative research to design an environmental program for obesity prevention in schools in Mexico City

Contribution of formative research to design an environmental program for obesity prevention in schools in Mexico City

Anabelle Bonvecchio, PhD,(1) Florence L Théodore, PhD,(1) Margarita Safdie, PhD,(1,2) Tiffany Duque, MPH, RD,(1) María Ángeles Villanueva, MSC,(1) Catalina Torres, MSC,(1) Juan Rivera, PhD.(1)

(1) Centro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Morelos, México.

(2) School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queens University. Kingston Ontario, Canadá.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v56s2.5178

Abstract

Objective. This paper describes the methods and key findings of formative research conducted to design a school-based program for obesity prevention. Materials and methods. Formative research was based on the ecological model and the principles of social marketing. A mixed method approach was used. Qualitative (direct observation, indepth interviews, focus group discussions and photo-voice) and quantitative (closed ended surveys, checklists, anthropometry) methods were employed. Results. Formative research key findings, including barriers by levels of the ecological model, were used for designing a program including environmental strategies to discourage the consumption of energy dense foods and sugar beverages. Conclusion. Formative research was fundamental to developing a context specific obesity prevention program in schools that seeks environment modification and behavior change.

Keywords: interdisciplinary research; obesity; school feeding; environment; Mexico

Resumen

Objetivo. Describir los aspectos metodológicos y principales resultados de una investigación formativa realizada para diseñar un programa ambiental para la prevención de obesidad en escuelas. Material y métodos. La investigación formativa se basó en el modelo ecológico y los principios del mercadeo social. Se utilizó un enfoque de métodos mixtos: cualitativos (observación directa, entrevistas en profundidad, grupos de discusión y foto-voz) y cuantitativos (cuestionarios cerrados, inventarios de alimentos y bebidas, antropometría). Resultados. Los principales resultados de la investigación formativa, incluyendo las barreras identificadas en los niveles del modelo ecológico, fueron contemplados para el diseño del programa, que incluyó estrategias ambientales para desincentivar el consumo de alimentos de alta densidad energética y bebidas azucaradas. Conclusión. La investigación formativa fue fundamental para diseñar un programa de prevención de obesidad para la modificación del ambiente y cambios de comportamientos, factible y adaptado al contexto de las escuelas públicas de la Ciudad de México.

Palabras clave: investigación interdisciplinaria; obesidad; alimentación escolar; ambiente; México


Mexico has experienced one of the fastest increases of overweight and obesity in the world. Currently 34% of Mexican school age children are either overweight or obese.1

There is growing evidence that the rapid increase in childhood obesity is mainly a result of the changes in the environment rather than a biological issue. However, many obesity prevention programs to date have focused on individual behavior change, generally leading to only short-term obesity improvements, versus environmental change.2-5 According to available evidence, school environments that support healthy food choices and physical activity for children likely decrease the risk of obesity.6 Despite the apparent advantages of addressing obesity at schools, there is a relative lack of evidence of effectiveness of school-based programs.5,7 According to Baranowski´s Model of Mediation and Moderation of Intervention Outcomes,8 inappropriate program design, selection of interventions that do not impact mediators of behaviors, and selection of targeted behaviors not related to health outcomes, could explain this lack of effectiveness and impact. All of the above can result from an unclear understanding of the target population and the environmental context, possibly a result of absence of or inappropriate formative research. Formative research is a key component of behavior change interventions, and its utility in developing intervention trials has been documented by various authors.7,9 Appropriately designed prevention programs, based on formative research and using multi-level interventions, including environmental modification, may be most effective at influencing health outcomes.10 This article describes the methods and key findings of formative research conducted to design a school-based program for obesity prevention. Formative research was the first step and a key component of a larger cluster randomized trial to prevent obesity in public primary schools of Mexico City.11 The trial had two components: healthy eating and physical activity. The physical activity results have been published elsewhere.12-13 This article focuses on the healthy eating component.

Materials and methods

Rationale for the formative research and theoretical frame

Formative research is conducted before an intervention is developed or implemented to obtain detailed information about the people for whom, and the context in which, interventions will be designed.14 Our formative research was based on simplified ecological model based on McLeroys schema15 and the principles of social marketing,16 using a mixed-methods approach.

Formative research was conducted in order to: a) assess school environment; b) understand school actors’ beliefs and attitudes towards obesity and healthy eating during schools hours; c) understand barriers which limit healthy eating at schools; and d) identify appropriate program intervention strategies.

Study settings

Public primary schools in the south of Mexico City were included in the study and randomly chosen from a list of all schools that met the following criteria: 1) morning schedule (8:00am to 12:30pm), 2) located in the south of Mexico City, 3) classified by the Ministry of Education (MOE) as low socioeconomic status, 4) received the national school breakfast program (SBP) 5) at least one school yard facility for PA and the standard sport equipment provided by Secretary of Public Education, and 6) Over 300 students and two or more classrooms per grade. In the southern area of the city there were four districts with a total of 274 schools, of which, 83 met all inclusion criteria. From these 83 schools, 12 were randomly selected.

Students from 4th and 5th grades (9 to 11 years of age) were included in the study due to their cognitive development allowing for answering questions and reporting eating pattern information. This group could also be followed-up after the intervention trial the following year in 5th and 6th grades.

Project staff held informational meetings with the parents of all eligible students. Parents of participating students signed an informed consent and children gave their oral assent. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research, Ethics and Biosecurity Commissions of the National Institute of Public Health (INSP, for its abbreviation in Spanish).

Data collection

The information collected by different levels of the ecological model: Individual (children), interpersonal (parents and teachers), organizational (school, principals, food vendors and minister of education authorities) community, environment and policy level is presented in table I.

1

Sample

A purposive sample was used to select participants for qualitative instruments. For the quantitative instruments, a random-number generation program was used to select the sample of students from each participating classroom.

Data collection techniques

An overview of the instruments used and sample sizes are presented in table II. Figure 1 illustrates the photo voice technique.

2

1

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics, mainly percentages and measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated for quantitative information to characterize the schools and the study population. Overweight and obesity were classified according to International Obesity Task Force criteria, with cutoff points for body mass index (BMI) based on an international reference population, specific for age and sex. Said cutoff points are a projection of the criteria proposed by WHO for diagnosing overweight (BMI of 25-29.9) and obesity (BMI of 30 or more) in adults.19 All the quantitative analyses were performed using Stata version 9.0.(a)

All In-depth interviews and discussion groups were taped and transcribed. The information was categorized and analyzed using the grounded theory.20 The phenomenology theory,21 which places emphasis on the social construction of the reality, was used for interpretation.

Results

Formative research was conducted in two phases. Phase 1: Information gathering: a) Assessment of the school environment, b) Information from school personnel (teachers, principals, vendors), students and parents and c) Identification of barriers and opportunities to potential strategies and Phase 2: Consultation process with school stakeholders (teacher and Secretary of Public Education [SEP, for its abbreviation in Spanish] SEP authorities) for the selection of final trial´s strategies to maximize feasibility.

The information allowed the identification of main factors that affect healthy eating at schools. Preliminary strategies were selected based on the available evidence and results from Phase 1 of the formative research. In Phase 2, a consultative process with main school stakeholders was conducted to aid in the final program strategies selection.

The resultant key barriers that have implications in intervention planning were organized and summarized in a conceptual diagram by different levels of the ecological model (figure 2).

2

Individual level (children)

Children recognized that they should consume more vegetables, fruits and water, although they could not resist “tasty” (junk) food and sweetened beverages. They preferred bringing money to school versus a lunch.

Interpersonal level (parents and teachers)

Most of the participant children had either one or two working parents who indicated lack of time to pack lunches and ease of sending money instead. Parents also indicated children’s preference for money. Parents lacked awareness of obesity and healthy eating, and some viewed overweight as healthy or a sign of being well fed. Parents believed they have little control over what children eat during school hours, and a child’s preference is the main argument in parents’ decisions about food.

Regarding teachers, interviews showed that they believed that nutrition is the responsibility of parents, and they did not specifically relate obesity to the school environment. Teachers ate during class and allowed students to do so, even rewarding students with candies. In addition, they contend that parents give money to children to buy lunch at school because they do not have time to prepare lunch.

Organizational

School environment: From direct observation we identified that children have up to five opportunities to eat during school hours (8am - 12.30pm). This may increase the probability of excess energy consumption because most of the food available is energy dense. Canteens are uncommon in Mexican public schools and there are no vending machines. Foods and beverages are sold by concession stands managed by individual vendors who pay a fee to the schools cooperative committee; this represents important profit for both vendors and schools. Vendor selection is mostly based on food safety and low prices.

School breakfast program (SBP): the subsidized Federal SBP covered up to 33; 35, and 39% of children’s daily recommendations of calories, fat and carbohydrates, respectively. Fruits are provided twice weekly and sugar beverages are offered daily. Surveys indicate that 72% of student eat the breakfast provided by the SBP, and 77% of those students do so every day.

Lunch during recess: During recess, schools yards were taken over by food vendors, selling mostly low cost sugared, fatty, energy dense food, leaving little space for activities. The majority of food items available were pizza, corn dogs and Mexican deep fried foods such as tacos and quesadillas, laden with cream. Most children did not bring lunch from home; instead they were given enough money to buy food that represents as much as 520 to 1120 kcal at lunch/day. Drinking water was not available, and there was a widespread availability of non-carbonated sugar beverages. Fruit and vegetables represented only 6.7% of products sold during recess and are sold with chili powder, cream, yogurt, honey and/or sugar to make them more attractive to children.

Awareness of the problem: None of the principals was able to recognize an obesity problem among their students; they were more concerned with undernutrition, despite results revealing that 41% of children in 4th and 5th grades (n=1731) were overweight or obese.

Food vendors: Emphasis was placed on providing hygienic foods and satisfying child preferences rather than nutritionally healthy items. Fruit and vegetable vendors believed it is time demanding peeling, cutting and maintaining these perishable foods. Vendors believed that their food was healthy because it was “homemade” regardless of the nutritional content.

Community level (community and policy)

Community: In Mexico City, working families often consume meals away from home from street vendors that provide “homemade” items such as tacos, tamales, tortas, etc., most of which are high in calories and fat. Analyzing the symbolic dimension of school food practices, two main representations that structure the relationship of key actors with school feeding were: (1) idealization of the homemade food regardless of the ingredients and cooking techniques, (2) ideation that the use of vegetables and fruit, even in very small amounts, transforms any food or drink into a healthy product. These representations represent a barrier for the availability and consumption of healthy food and beverages at school. Social representation linked to school feeding has been published elsewhere.22

School norms: At the time of the study, no national regulations existed on type or content of food sold on school grounds. An interim regulation was placed restricting eating in classrooms to SBP only and prohibiting the sales of soda, though this regulation was never enforced.

The intervention was designed according to these results to target different levels of the ecological model to provide a supportive environment for healthy eating at schools (table III).

3

A communication strategy based on social marketing,23 social cognitive theory,24 and theory of planned behavior25 was developed for students, parents, teachers and vendors (individual, interpersonal and organizational levels).

At the organizational level, in addition to the physical activity intervention published elsewhere,12,26 strategies to improve offerings of healthy food and water and to reduce opportunities to eat and availability of non-healthy food and beverages were selected.

Detailed information regarding the final strategies implemented in the trial has been published elsewhere.11

Discussion

Through this formative research process we collected information from ecological levels, as well from the social marketing perspective (channel identification, development of relevant messages, among others) with a mixed-methods approach, to guide the development of an intervention tailored to children in Mexico City public schools.

The ecological model has been recognized as a theoretical and methodological framework able to support consistent and holistic approaches during the design, implementation and evaluation of health improvement interventions.27 The importance of recognizing the influences of the different levels of the ecological model and their interactions in developing effective interventions to improving children’s dietary intake in schools has been documented.28

In addition, the use of multiple data collection methods during formative research has been recommended in this type of study.29-30 We carefully selected several methods appropriate to the information gaps and needs of the trial. The use of methodological instruments and stakeholders’ triangulation was useful to a) understand the problem from different points of view, b) better understand the school environment, c) corroborate and explain information within methods, d) develop a comprehensive matrix of the situation, e) guide theintervention selection, and g) to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention by different stakeholders. These and other advantages of using multiple methods in formative research, including the understanding of the cultural and ethnic diversity of the targeted audience, have been published elsewhere.30-31

Our formative research showed that the school environment restricts opportunities for healthy eating, and enhances opportunities to consume highly energy dense foods and sugary beverages, promoting a positive energy imbalance. The important role of the school environment in sustaining energy imbalance that leads to overweight and obesity in school children has been documented.32 Therefore, an environment that promotes obesity is prev iling in the studied public schools of Mexico City.

The findings were used to formulate recommendations on the type of interventions needed to remove some of the barriers. For example, lack of parental time for lunch preparation was perceived as a main barrier by all stakeholders, thus teaching children how to prepare and pack a healthy lunch was a recommended strategy. However, this barrier is complex because inexpensive “homemade food” sold on school grounds is attractive and convenient for working parents and children. Thus in addition to teaching children how to pack a healthy lunch, it is necessary that the options offered to children are healthy options and do not compete with the potentially healthy food brought from home.

Developing an effective school based intervention to prevent obesity is a challenge.10 This can be partially accomplished by formative research, as it can be used to identify barriers for change and to select interventions that are appropriate to the context and feasible to implement. Despite this important use of formative research, there are few publications on the formative research process and results.29

Limitations

There were some important barriers identified that were out of the scope of the project, for instance, the school breakfast program that was identified as a contributor of the energy dense foods available at schools, could not be modified in the short term. Recommendations for improving it were communicated to the corresponding agency.

The large amount of information produced by using quantitative and qualitative methods, although very valuable, was highly time and resource demanding. For this reason, qualitative and quantitative information from formative research is not often presented in the same article. Sampling sizes are not representative of the entire population, however for the qualitative methodology sample size is not a matter of concern33 as well as for formative research, where sample sizes vary considerably among published studies.29,30

Conclusions

While the childhood obesity epidemic is very complex, it is difficult to reverse the problem without strong school-based policies and programs that support healthy eating and physical activity.34 We are aware that it is not feasible to reach meaningful change by targeting only the environmental, individual and interpersonal factors associated with eating at schools. Interventions on the larger economic and social forces that affect healthy choices are needed.2 However, these interventions are complex and occur over the long-term. Short-term interventions adequately designed and context specific should be implemented to foster healthy lifestyles and contribute to stopping or reversing the situation at public schools. This study followed a proven process of conducting research and using the findings to make strategic decisions about program interventions. Information was collected in a sequence designed to inform an intervention tailored to the specific needs and problems encountered in schools. Using formative research based on the ecological model is a promising way to develop appropriate obesity prevention interventions that seek environmental modification as well as behavior change.

The findings of the formative research provided evidence on the school environment that fostered policy change in Mexican elementary public schools.35,36 This article will be helpful for other groups interested in conducting formative research previous to the design and planning of any program (or policy) to increase its potential effectiveness.

Aknowledgements

Supported by International Life Science Institute (ILSI), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the Mexican Council for Science and Technology (Conacyt, for its abbreviation in Spanish), and Mexican Ministry of Health (SSa).


Declaration of conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Notes

(a) Stata version 9.0. Statacorp. Stata Statistical Software.Texas: Stata Corporation, 2003.


References

1. Gutierrez J, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutricion 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2012.

2. Peters JC. Combating Obesity: Challenges and Choices. Obes Res 2003;11(S10):7S-11S. http://doi.org/b8h93c

3. OMS. Dieta, nutrición y prevención de enfermedades crónicas. Ginebra: OMS, FAO, 2003.

4. Katz D, O’Connell M, Njike V, M-C Yeh MC, Nawaz N. Strategies for the prevention and control of obesity in the school setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2008;32:1780-1789.

5. Brown T, Summerbell C. Systematic review of school-based interventions that focus on changing dietary intake and physical activity levels to prevent childhood obesity: an update to the obesity guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obes Rev 2009;10(1):110-141. http://doi.org/cd7qzh

6. Hill O, Wyatt H, Reed J, Peters J. Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here? Science 2003;299(5608 ):853-855. http://doi.org/bmh3p9

7. Peterson K, Fox M. Addressing the epidemic of childhood obesity through school-based interventions: what has been done and where do we go from here? J Law Med Ethics 2007;35(1):113-130. http://doi.org/dv88xq

8. Baranowski T, Cerin E, Baranowski J. Steps in the design, development and formative evaluation of obesity prevention-related behavior change trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009;6(6). http://doi.org/d2zjmt

9. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson C, et al. Formative Research in School and Community-Based Health Programs and Studies: “State of the Art” and the TAAG Approach. Health Educ Behav 2006;33(1):25-39. http://doi.org/bdg4b9

10. Story M, Nanney M, Schwartz M. Schools and obesity prevention: creating school environments and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity. Milbank Q 2009;87(1):71-100. http://doi.org/dnfvbp

11. Safdie M, Lévesque L, González-Casanova I, Salvo D, Islas A, Hernández-Cordero S, et al. Promoting healthful diet and physical activity in the Mexican school system for the prevention of obesity in children. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55(3):S357-S373. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v55s3.5137

12. Jennings-Aburto N, Nava F, Bonvecchio A, Safdie M, González-Casanova I, Gust I, et al. Physical activity during the school day in public primary schools in Mexico City. Salud Publica Mex 2009;51:141-147. http://doi.org/dkmbj2

13. Aburto-Jennings N, Fulton J, Safdie M, Duque T, Bonvecchio A, Rivera J, et al. Impact of a School-Based Intervention on Physical Activity: Cluster-Randomized Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43(10):1898-1906. http://doi.org/cfbggx

14. Gittelsohn J, Evans M, Story M, Davis S, Metcalfe L, Helitzer D. Multisite formative research for the Pathways study to prevent obesity in American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:767S-772S.

15. McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15(4):351-377. http://doi.org/bxzmgj

16. Andreasen A. Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote Health, Social Development and de environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995.

17. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. School Health Index. 2004 edition. Available at: https://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/shi/default.aspx

18. Wang C, Burris M. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav 2004;24:369-387. http://doi.org/bgww5v

19. Cole T, Bellizzi M, Flegal K, Dietz W. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320(7244):1240-1243. http://doi.org/b9n3ms

20. Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine Transaction, 1967.

21. Berger P, Luckmann T. Construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1968.

22. Théodore FL, Bonvecchio-Arenas A, Blanco-García I, Carreto-Rivera Y. Representaciones sociales relacionadas con la alimentación escolar: el caso de las escuelas públicas de la Ciudad de México. Salud colectiva 2011;7(2):215-229. http://doi.org/bsgr

23. Lee N, Kotler P. Social marketing. Influencing behaviours for good. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2011.

24. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52(1):1-26. http://doi.org/dqmktz

25. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Proces 1991;50(2):179-211. http://doi.org/cc3

26. Jennings-Aburto N, Fulton J, Safdie M, Duque T, Bonvecchio A, Rivera- J, et al. Impact of a School-Based Intervention on Physical Activity: Cluster-Randomized Trial. Med Sci Sport Exer 2011;43(10):1898-1906. http://doi.org/cfbggx

27. Moore S, Murphy S, Moore L. Health improvement, nutritional behaviour and the role of school meals: the usefulness of a socio-ecological perspective to inform policy design, implementation and evaluation. Crit Public Health 2011;21:441-454. http://doi.org/ftww4n

28. Moore L, De Silva-Sanigorski A, Moore S. A socio-ecological perspective on behavioral interventions to influence food choice in schools: alternative, complementary or synergistic? Public Health Nutr 2013;16(1):1000-1005. http://doi.org/bsgs

29. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson C, Pratt C, Grieser M, Pickrel J, et al. Formative Research in School and Community-Based Health Programs and Studies: “State of the Art” and the TAAG Approach. Health Educ Behav 2006;33(1):25-39. http://doi.org/bdg4b9

30. Ayala G, Elder J, Campbell N, et al. Nutrition communication for a Latino community: formative research foundations. Fam Community Health 2001;24(3):72-87. http://doi.org/bsgt

31. Kumanyika S, Story M, Beech B, et al. Collaborative planning for formative assessment and cultural appropriateness in the Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS): a retrospection. Ethn Dis 2003;13(1 Suppl 1):S15-S29.

32. Waters E, de Silva-Sanigorski A, Hall BJ, Brown T, Campbell KJ, Gao Y, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:00. http://doi.org/b87xcd

33. Strauss A, Corbin J. Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarollar la teoria fundamentada. Antioquia: Universidad de Antioquia, 2002

34. Story M, Kaphingst K, French S. The Role of Schools in Obesity Prevention Obes Rev 2006;16(1):109-142.

35. Saffie M, Jennings-Aburto N, Lévesque L, Janssen I, Campirano-Núñez F, López-Olmedo N, et al. Impact of a school-based intervention program on obesity risk factors in Mexican Children. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55:379-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v55s3.5138

36. Safdie M, Cargo M, Richard L, Lévesque L. An ecological and theorical deconstruction of a school-based obesity prevention program in Mexico. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014:11-103.

Enlaces refback





Salud Pública de México es una publicación periódica electrónica, bimestral, publicada por el Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (con domicilio en Avenida Universidad núm. 655, col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, C.P. 62100, teléfono 329-3000, página web, www.insp.mx), con ISSN: 1606-7916 y Reserva de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo con número: 04-2012-071614550600-203, ambos otorgados por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. Editor responsable: Carlos Oropeza Abúndez. Responsable de la versión electrónica: Subdirección de Comunicación Científica y Publicaciones, Avenida Universidad núm. 655, planta baja, col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, C.P. 62100, teléfono 329 3000. Fecha de última modificación: 11 de abril de 2019. D.R. © por el sitio: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.

Gestionando el conocimiento